Memory Care at Home STL

St. Louis and the surrounding counties

This site is about non-medical support in a person's own home. It is not about residential memory care facilities, and it does not rate any.

Read this first

This page compares states on whether a conversation happened. It does not say what was found in that conversation, and it is not a measure of how much memory loss there is anywhere.

Nothing here is medical advice. If you are reading this because you are worried about somebody, the page written for that moment is talking to a doctor about memory, which is about preparing for the appointment rather than about counting them.

Nobody who writes for this site is a clinician, and the figures below cannot tell you anything about the person you care for.

Missouri is near the bottom on raising memory loss with a doctor

Of the older Missourians who say their memory is getting worse, most have never raised it with anyone qualified to look. Most states do a little better. A few do a lot better, and it is worth seeing which.

The most useful thing in this survey is not a number about memory at all. It is a number about a conversation. After asking older adults whether their memory is getting worse, the survey asks the ones who said yes whether they have talked with a health care professional about it.

That question matters more than any other on this site because it is the only one a family can change by Tuesday. Nobody can alter how common memory loss is in their state. Anybody can book an appointment. And the reason to book it is not that a website says so; it is that changes in memory have many causes, some of them treatable, and the ones that are not treatable are still easier to live with once they have been named.

So here is the table, and it is not a flattering one for Missouri. But read it the way it deserves to be read, which is as a description of where the gap is widest, not as a verdict on anybody in it.

The twelve where the conversation happens most

Ordered from the highest share downwards. The full table of all 46 follows, and Missouri is a long way further down it.

  1. Rhode Island, 58.4 percent of those reporting memory loss
  2. Florida, 52.9 percent of those reporting memory loss
  3. Washington, 49.2 percent of those reporting memory loss
  4. Maine, 48.2 percent of those reporting memory loss
  5. Oregon, 47.5 percent of those reporting memory loss
  6. New Hampshire, 47.4 percent of those reporting memory loss
  7. Michigan, 46.2 percent of those reporting memory loss
  8. Vermont, 45.5 percent of those reporting memory loss
  9. Virginia, 45.4 percent of those reporting memory loss
  10. Indiana, 45.2 percent of those reporting memory loss
  11. Oklahoma, 44.8 percent of those reporting memory loss
  12. North Carolina, 44.7 percent of those reporting memory loss

Every jurisdiction in the series

All 46 states and jurisdictions with a complete set of figures in this series, highest first. Missouri is shaded, Illinois is lightly shaded. The range is the confidence interval the CDC publishes with each estimate.
RankState or jurisdictionTalked to a professionalRange
1Rhode Island58.4%48.9 to 67.3
2Florida52.9%42.3 to 63.1
3Washington49.2%42.0 to 56.4
4Maine48.2%41.6 to 54.9
5Oregon47.5%38.5 to 56.7
6New Hampshire47.4%38.5 to 56.4
7Michigan46.2%39.1 to 53.6
8Vermont45.5%38.0 to 53.2
9Virginia45.4%40.6 to 50.3
10Indiana45.2%38.3 to 52.2
11Oklahoma44.8%37.6 to 52.2
12North Carolina44.7%33.2 to 56.8
13Utah44.4%39.0 to 50.0
14Mississippi44.2%37.8 to 50.8
15Colorado43.4%34.6 to 52.5
16Ohio43.4%36.9 to 50.1
17Louisiana42.9%33.3 to 53.0
18New Mexico42.8%34.4 to 51.6
19Idaho42.6%35.3 to 50.3
20Nevada42.6%33.9 to 51.8
21Illinois42.5%28.8 to 57.5
22New York41.4%34.9 to 48.3
23Kansas41.0%33.4 to 49.0
24Tennessee40.8%34.4 to 47.6
25Alabama39.8%33.0 to 47.0
26Connecticut39.1%28.2 to 51.1
27Iowa38.8%29.4 to 49.1
28West Virginia38.3%30.9 to 46.3
29Maryland37.9%28.9 to 47.8
30South Carolina37.9%31.7 to 44.5
31Wisconsin37.8%31.8 to 44.2
32Minnesota37.7%32.3 to 43.5
33Alaska36.9%24.1 to 51.8
34Pennsylvania36.5%27.5 to 46.6
35Nebraska36.3%29.7 to 43.5
36Texas36.3%31.0 to 41.9
37California36.2%26.2 to 47.6
38Missouri35.3%28.6 to 42.5
39Kentucky33.9%24.6 to 44.6
40Wyoming33.6%24.8 to 43.7
41Arkansas32.8%25.5 to 41.0
42Georgia31.3%24.9 to 38.4
43Arizona31.2%24.3 to 39.1
44North Dakota28.6%21.9 to 36.4
45Hawaii28.4%21.8 to 36.2
46District of Columbia27.8%19.2 to 38.3

Missouri, and how much the range allows

Missouri reports 35.3 percent, which places it 38 of 46. The CDC's range for that estimate runs from 28.6 to 42.5 percent. Illinois reports 42.5 percent and ranks 21, but with a range from 28.8 to 57.5 that covers all but the bottom two tenths of Missouri's, so the two neighbours cannot honestly be separated on this question.

What the range does allow is the comparison with the top. Rhode Island's estimate is 58.4 percent, with a range that starts at 48.9, and that starting point is above the top of Missouri's range. So the gap between Missouri and the best-performing state is not a sampling artefact. It is there in the intervals as well as in the estimates.

The shape of the table is also worth noticing. Only two jurisdictions clear fifty percent. Twenty-two sit somewhere in the forties. Three fall below thirty, ending with the District of Columbia at 27.8. Missouri belongs to the group just above that floor: not the bottom, but in sight of it.

Two out of three, turned around

The Missouri figure means that roughly two of every three older adults in this state who know their memory is getting worse have not mentioned it to a doctor. That is the gap this site most wants to close, and the page for closing it is talking to a doctor about memory: what to say, what to bring, and what the appointment is for.

What raising it does not mean

Talking to a professional is not the same as being diagnosed with anything, and the survey does not ask what came of the conversation. A state near the top of this table is a state where the subject gets raised, which is good, and nothing more can be read into it.

A state near the bottom is not a state where doctors are unavailable or families are careless. The survey cannot see why the conversation did not happen: fear, distance, cost, the assumption that nothing can be done, or a simple reluctance to be the one who brings it up. All of those are ordinary and all of them are reasons a family in Missouri might recognise.

And none of it is about the person you care for. If they have not had the conversation, the useful response is to help it happen, and the National Institute on Aging's guidance on preparing for a doctor's appointment is a plain place to start.